AUTOMATAsoftware that writes the report

Development preview: desktop release availability, pricing and supported features are awaiting confirmation. The browser demo is available now.

School psychology reports. Written for you.

AUTOMATA is being developed to help psychologists turn assessment data into tables, graphs, narrative, and recommendations for professional review. Explore the intended workflow below, then ask us what is supported in a verified release.

Runs on de-identified records. Names and identifiers never leave your files.

Development preview: This page describes the intended workflow. Desktop release availability, supported features and deployment arrangements must be confirmed for your setup. View release status.

01
Feature tour

From assessment data to a psychoeducational report.

You do the first step and the last one. AUTOMATA does everything in between, and every step leaves a trail.

01

Upload — the PDFs and the records, as they are

Drop in the score reports (WISC-V, WJ IV, WRAML-3, PH-3 (Piers-Harris 3), BASC-3, Vineland-3, and common rating scales), prior evaluations and student records. AUTOMATA reads them directly; you never retype a number. Every score, percentile, confidence interval, date and descriptor lands in one structured data sheet with the page it came from. A printed value always wins over a computed one.

PH-3 Score Report.pdf (sample) → data sheet TOT T 38 %ile 10 p.2 BEH T 45 %ile 81 p.2 printed wins INT T 40 %ile 17 p.2 PH DATE 12/14/2025 p.1, column match 9 scales · 52 tags · 0 dropped
02

Descriptors — from the publisher's own band table

"Low Average" means what Pearson, Riverside or WPS says it means, for that instrument. Every band table in AUTOMATA is checked against the publisher and covered by a self-test that fails loudly if a cutoff ever drifts. Tails read "<1" and ">99", the way the report prints them.

WRAML-3 GMI 68 → Extremely Low (7-band table) WJ IV "<40" → <1 · Very Low (bound kept) WISC-V VSI 84 → Low Average self-test: 150 / 150 checks pass
03

Write — tables, graphs, and every data point in context

AUTOMATA builds the score tables and graphs, then discusses each data point as it relates to the student's suspected disability — or the absence of one — in your own template and voice. Strengths and needs, previous-assessment summaries and the eligibility reasoning are written the same way.

Working memory was an area of significant need. The Working Memory Index of 79 (8th percentile, 95% CI 73–88) fell in the Very Low range — a processing weakness consistent with the suspected Specific Learning Disability… + score table · + index graph · every bold value linked to its cell
04

Recommend — score-specific, tied to the eligibility

Clinical recommendations are generated from the actual scores and the eligibility category, not from a generic list: a Very Low working memory index under an SLD finding produces different recommendations than the same score under OHI, and an Average one produces none. Prior testing is carried forward into a score-history table alongside.

WMI 79 · Very Low · SLD (auditory processing / memory) → chunk multi-step directions; provide written copies → preferential seating; check for understanding → extended time on tasks with heavy memory load each recommendation cites the score that produced it
05

Verify — every claim, before you see it

Every score in the prose is matched to the table. Every descriptor is matched to the band. Section order, required headings and formatting are audited against your standard. A mismatch is flagged, never silently fixed. A missing score leaves the sentence blank and flagged — AUTOMATA never fills a gap with a plausible number.

✓ 27 of 27 cited values traced to a cell ✓ 5 of 5 descriptors match band table ! PSI missing from table — sentence left blank, flagged ✓ heading order matches template
06

Approve — nothing runs without a yes

The audit is a proposal, not an action. You see what would change, accept or reject each item, and sign. Identifying data was never in the draft: AUTOMATA works on de-identified records, and the finished report is re-assembled on your side.

3 proposed fixes · you choose [ accept ] descriptor "Low" → "Low Average" [ reject ] reorder "Background" above "Observations" [ accept ] add PH DATE to summary table nothing written until you click
02
Under the hood

Built for the report you actually sign.

InstrumentsWISC-V, WJ IV, WRAML-3, PH-3 (Piers-Harris 3), BASC-3, Vineland-3, and common rating scales — more on request
InputsPublisher score PDFs, spreadsheets, scoring portals, prior evaluations, records
OutputTables, score graphs, narrative and recommendations in your template — Word or Google Docs
PrivacyDe-identified drafting; identifiers stay in your files; nothing identifying stored
RecommendationsScore-specific and eligibility-based; each one cites the score behind it
PercentilesPrinted wins; formula is the fallback; "<1" / ">99" tails preserved
DescriptorsPublisher band tables, self-tested; never invented
VerificationNumber-to-cell, descriptor-to-band, format-to-template; flags, never silent fixes
ControlEvery automated change is a proposal you accept or reject
Development feature tour. Desktop capabilities on this page are subject to release verification. They are not an approved plan or supported-feature guarantee. Use the fictional browser demo to inspect the currently available example.
03
Everything it does

Automate the work around the report, too.

A report is more than paragraphs. AUTOMATA brings together assessment records, interview transcription and survey responses, then prepares tables, graphs, summaries and narratives for your review.

Try assessment data to report automation · Read a fictional sample report · Watch the score-to-report walkthrough

Getting the information in

It goes and finds the data.

  • Pulls the student's details straight out of their records — no retyping.
  • Finds previous test scores, organizes them, and writes them up.
  • Upload or photograph the score report — it reads the numbers off the page, so nothing is retyped or guessed at.
  • Transcribes your interviews.
  • Automates teacher survey emails and reminders through the web app, then summarizes responses for report writing. See the teacher survey workflow.
  • Sends a parent survey by phone or email, in English or Spanish.
Doing the arithmetic

It does the math you shouldn't be doing.

  • Works out the percentile for every score.
  • Puts the right range next to it — Low Average, Very Low — from the publisher's own table.
  • Builds the score tables and the graphs.
  • Carries a full plain-English description of every common assessment tool.
Writing it up

It drafts the parts that take longest.

  • Writes the summary for you.
  • Gives you interpretation support — what the pattern of scores is telling you.
  • Analyzes the student's data, or takes an analysis you already have.
  • Uses your own report template, or builds you one.
Getting it out the door

It chases the parts you'd forget.

  • Finds the providers on the case and emails them for you.
  • Keeps reminding them until they answer, without you having to.
  • Sign inside the app, or drop in your own signature.
In your pocket

The phone sidekick.

The desk work happens on your computer. The rest of the job happens in a classroom, a hallway, or someone's living room — so AUTOMATA comes with you. Open it on your phone, hit record, and it lands in the right student's file before you're back at your desk.

  • Record an interview and get it typed up — with who said what.
  • Write up an observation while you're still in the room.
  • Upload a file from your phone — a photo of a work sample, a scanned form, a score report.
  • It files itself under the right student, so nothing sits in your notes app waiting to be moved.
Early-access inquiries

Find the right fit.

Prices, release availability, seat limits, and included app features have not been finalized. These cards compare inquiry needs, not purchasable plans.

01 / individual

Practitioner

To be confirmed

For an individual evaluator.

  • Discuss your instruments and report templates
  • Confirm supported workflows with the approved build
  • Pricing and release access: to be confirmed
Discuss your needs
02 / team

Practice

To be confirmed

For a practice exploring a shared workflow.

  • Discuss evaluator count and template requirements
  • Confirm collaboration and support requirements
  • Pricing and seat limits: to be confirmed
Discuss your needs
03 / organization

District & organization

To be confirmed

For teams planning deployment and review.

  • Discuss deployment, accessibility and procurement needs
  • Confirm integrations and data-handling requirements
  • Pricing and available features: to be confirmed
Discuss your needs

An inquiry does not create an account, start a subscription, or charge you. Any paid terms and supported features will be confirmed before an agreement. Verified with the product owner on September 30, 2026.

Get started

Bring us your worst report. We'll show you AUTOMATA write it.

Tell us what you write, what you write it from, and how long it takes today. We'll reply from a real inbox.

Opens a pre-filled email to info@drvalentinespsychlab.com — no account, no mailing list.