AUTOMATA · software that writes the report

Less report busywork. More time for students.

Explore AUTOMATA’s developing report-writing workflow, try free browser tools, or discuss custom apps, templates and data integrations for your practice. Built around the work of psychologists and district teams.

Try the live demo See the report workflow

Explore with fictional data. Desktop release availability and supported features are being confirmed.

Frazier Park, California · Built by Kevin Valentine, PhD, Licensed Educational Psychologist · Free resources · Teacher survey automation

Input · WISC-VFictional example

Index	SS	%ile	Range
Verbal Comprehension	104	61	Average
Working Memory	79	8	Very Low
Processing Speed	92	30	Average

Composes · verifies

Working memory was an area of significant need. The Working Memory Index of 79 (8th percentile) fell in the Very Low range — about 92% of same-age peers scored higher.

Scores traced to source · descriptors match publisher bands · open the live demo

Free tools

Score calculator A score in, the percentile and range out Date calculator Age at testing, deadlines, annual, triennial APA table & graph Score table and graph, ready for Word APA score grapher Pick a test, copy a Times New Roman figure

Watch

AUTOMATA, in about a minute.

What we make

AUTOMATA — a report-writing workflow in development.

Upload score-report PDFs and student records; AUTOMATA writes the tables, graphs, narrative, and score-specific recommendations. You review and sign.

Feature tour Pricing Live demo

See it work

A score table goes in. A cited paragraph comes out.

Live example: the highlighted row is the one being written about. Every number in the sentence is traced back to its cell.

Input · score tableWISC-V · example data

Index	SS	%ile	95% CI	Range
Verbal Comprehension	104	61	97–110	Average
Visual Spatial	84	14	78–92	Low Average
Fluid Reasoning	97	42	90–104	Average
Working Memory	79	8	73–88	Very Low
Processing Speed	92	30	84–101	Average

ComposesVerifiesOutput

What AUTOMATA does

You upload. AUTOMATA writes. You review.

Score-report PDFs and student records in; a finished report out — tables, graphs, narrative, and recommendations. Every step is checkable and every number leaves a trail back to its source.

01 / extract

Upload the PDFs. That's the whole job.

Publisher score reports, rating scales, prior evaluations, student records — drop them in as they are. Every score, percentile, confidence interval, date and descriptor lands in one data sheet with a link to the exact page it came from.

02 / compose

Writes the tables, graphs the scores, discusses every data point

Score tables and graphs are built for you. Each data point is discussed as it relates to the student's disability — or the lack of one — and the report closes with score-specific clinical recommendations based on the student's eligibility. All in your template, in your voice.

03 / verify

Checks every claim before you see it

Every score in the prose is matched to the table. Every descriptor is matched to the publisher's band. Format, heading order, and required sections are audited against your standard. Mismatches are flagged, never silently fixed.

How it works

Upload. Review. Sign.

Nothing is written until the data is verified, and nothing is finalized until you say so.

Upload

Score-report PDFs, rating scales, prior evaluations, student records — as they are.

Review the data sheet

One structured table of every score and fact. Fix anything once; it propagates everywhere.

AUTOMATA writes

Tables, graphs, narrative, and eligibility-based recommendations — in your template.

Review and sign

A verification report lists every check. You approve what runs. Then it’s yours.

Who AUTOMATA is for

Built for school & clinical psychologists who write the report.

AUTOMATA · school & clinical psychology

Psychoeducational and clinical assessment reports

Initial evaluations, triennials, and re-evaluations, built from the instruments you already give. Designed inside a working caseload, not a demo.

WISC-V, WJ IV, WRAML-3, PH-3 (Piers-Harris 3), BASC-3, Vineland-3, and common rating scales
Standard score → percentile → descriptor, computed and cross-checked
Previous-assessment summaries and score history carried forward
Eligibility reasoning laid out step by step, with the criteria named
Score-specific clinical recommendations based on the student’s eligibility
Score graphs and summary tables built automatically

Generated · previous assessment summary

On the prior evaluation (2023), cognitive functioning was assessed with the WISC-V. The Full Scale IQ of 94 (34th percentile, 95% CI 89–99) fell in the Average range. A relative weakness was noted in Working Memory (SS 79, 8th percentile), consistent with teacher reports of difficulty retaining multi-step directions.

Also fits The same engine can turn measurements into signed documents in engineering & QA, compliance, laboratory, and research reporting. School psychology ships first — tell us what you write if that’s your field.

Custom Solutions

Your workflow deserves a better fit.

We develop custom apps for districts and psychologists, professionally designed report templates, and data integration systems tailored to the way your team works.

Custom apps

Explore a focused tool for intake, workflow tracking, or report preparation.

Report templates

Bring consistent headings, score tables, figures, and editable sections into your format.

Data integrations

Plan how approved data sources can connect, with clear field mapping, validation and access requirements.

Explore custom solutions Discuss your project →

Accuracy & privacy

Reports people sign their name to. So the rules are strict.

Nothing is invented

Every number in the narrative must exist in the data sheet. If a score is missing, the sentence is left blank and flagged — the system never fills a gap with a plausible value.

Identifying data stays with you

Names and identifiers are held in your own files and systems. Drafting runs on de-identified records, and the report is re-assembled on your side.

You approve what runs

An audit is a proposal, not an action. Every automated fix is listed for you to accept or reject. Nothing overwrites your work without a yes.

“

AUTOMATA started with one psychologist, one spreadsheet, and one evening too many spent retyping numbers that were already printed on a PDF. Formulas became code, code became an app. Now you upload the PDFs, it writes the report, and you review it. AUTOMATA · Built inside a working caseload in Kern High School District

Early access

Tell us what takes too long.

We're onboarding a small group of practitioners and teams now. Tell us what you write, what you write it from, and how long it takes today.